CRISPR Rat Deletion

Get tips on using IMAGEN™ Parainfluenza Virus Group Kit using Direct Immunofluorescence Assay to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using PrepSEQ™ 1-2-3 Mycoplasma Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Mycoplasma

Get tips on using IMAGEN™ Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Kit using Direct Immunofluorescence Assay to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using IMAGEN™ Respiratory Syncytial Virus Kit (RSV) using Direct Immunofluorescence Assay to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using Remel™ PathoDX™ Herpes Typing Kit, PathoDx™ Herpes Typing Kit to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using IMAGEN™ Influenza Virus A and B Kit using Direct Immunofluorescence Assay to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using LSI VetMAX™ Bluetongue Virus Real-Time PCR Kit, BTV1 typing - IAH to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Get tips on using ViralSEQ™ Quantitative Sf-Rhabdovirus Kit with PrepSEQ™ Nucleic Acid Sample Prep Kit to perform Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit Virus

Hello everyone! I am going to do a live/dead assay for my cells and I saw that I can use both fluorescence and absorbance as my detection method. Is there a difference in the results depending on the method? Is one method preferred over the other in certain situations?

Acid phosphatase detection heavily relies on determining the concentration of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in the sample. Hence, sample preparation is very crucial and it should be done strictly as per kit manufacturer instructions to avoid any inconsistency and poor sensitivity