siRNA / miRNA gene silencing Mouse Embryonic stem cells

Get tips on using Mouse Osteopontin/OPN Antibody to perform Immunohistochemistry Mouse - Spp1/OPN

Get tips on using TLR10 shRNA (h) Lentiviral Particles to perform shRNA gene silencing Human - THP-1 TLR10

Get tips on using TLR10 shRNA (h) Lentiviral Particles to perform shRNA gene silencing Human - THP-1 TLR10

Get tips on using TruSeq Stranded mRNA to perform RNA sequencing Human - Glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs)

Microarrays enable researchers to monitor the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously. However, the sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and reproducibility are major challenges for this technology. Cross-hybridization, combination with splice variants, is a prime source for the discrepancies in differential gene expression calls among various microarray platforms. Removing (either from production or downstream bioinformatic analysis) and/or redesigning the microarray probes prone to cross-hybridization is a reasonable strategy to increase the hybridization specificity and hence, the accuracy of the microarray measurements.

Get tips on using Glut1 siRNA and shRNA Plasmids (h) to perform RNA sequencing Human - HT-1376 (urinary bladder cell line)

Get tips on using CD74 siRNA and shRNA Plasmids (h) to perform RNA sequencing Human - HT-1376 (urinary bladder cell line)

As autophagy is a multi-step process which includes not just the formation of autophagosomes, but most importantly, flux through the entire system, including the degradation upon fusion with lysosomes, which makes it quite challenging for detection. There are several methods for detection in mammalian cells, including immunoblotting analysis of LC3 and p62 and detection of autophagosome formation/maturation by fluorescence microscopy, Currently, there is no single “gold standard” for determining the autophagic activity that is applicable in every experimental context, hence it is recommended to go for the combined use of multiple methods to accurately assess the autophagic activity in any given biological setting.

As autophagy is a multi-step process which includes not just the formation of autophagosomes, but most importantly, flux through the entire system, including the degradation upon fusion with lysosomes, which makes it quite challenging for detection. There are several methods for detection in mammalian cells, including immunoblotting analysis of LC3 and p62 and detection of autophagosome formation/maturation by fluorescence microscopy, Currently, there is no single “gold standard” for determining the autophagic activity that is applicable in every experimental context, hence it is recommended to go for the combined use of multiple methods to accurately assess the autophagic activity in any given biological setting.

A standard angiogenic assay involves the autonomous endothelial cell response of self-organization into microvessels, also known as tubes when seeded on a basement membrane matrix in the presence of the appropriate growth factors. However, the component of basement membrane matrix may also affect the tube formation by endothelial cells. Hence it is important to use a standard angiogenesis assay kit or use the same membrane matrix with known composition to standardize the assay conditions.