No discussions found
Start your discussion
Share your thoughts or question with experts in your field
Start a discussion
Found 3 matching solutions for this experiment
Upstream tips |
Protocol tips |
Downstream tips |
For all experiments, cells were incubated in 0.5 μg Fc Block (BD Biosciences) for 10 minutes at RT. Surface staining was performed in the dark for 30 minutes at 4 °C in staining buffer. Cells were then washed twice with staining buffer followed by fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde (VWR, West Chester, PA, USA). |
|
For flow cytometry immunophenotyping experiments, cells were acquired on an LSR II cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm excitation lasers. The spleen FACS experiments were performed using a FACSAria II instrument (BD Immunocytometry Systems) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, or 633 nm lasers located at the University of Chicago Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Chicago, IL, USA. All data collection and sorting were performed using BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and data analyses were performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). |
Upstream tips |
For all experiments, cells were incubated in 0.5 μg Fc Block (BD Biosciences) for 10 minutes at RT. Surface staining was performed in the dark for 30 minutes at 4 °C in staining buffer. Cells were then washed twice with staining buffer followed by fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde (VWR, West Chester, PA, USA). |
Downstream tips |
For flow cytometry immunophenotyping experiments, cells were acquired on an LSR II cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm excitation lasers. The spleen FACS experiments were performed using a FACSAria II instrument (BD Immunocytometry Systems) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, or 633 nm lasers located at the University of Chicago Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Chicago, IL, USA. All data collection and sorting were performed using BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and data analyses were performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). |
Upstream tips |
Protocol tips |
Downstream tips |
For all experiments, cells were incubated in 0.5 μg Fc Block (BD Biosciences) for 10 minutes at RT. Surface staining was performed in the dark for 30 minutes at 4 °C in staining buffer. Cells were then washed twice with staining buffer followed by fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde (VWR, West Chester, PA, USA). |
|
For flow cytometry immunophenotyping experiments, cells were acquired on an LSR II cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm excitation lasers. The spleen FACS experiments were performed using a FACSAria II instrument (BD Immunocytometry Systems) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, or 633 nm lasers located at the University of Chicago Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Chicago, IL, USA. All data collection and sorting were performed using BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and data analyses were performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). |
Upstream tips |
For all experiments, cells were incubated in 0.5 μg Fc Block (BD Biosciences) for 10 minutes at RT. Surface staining was performed in the dark for 30 minutes at 4 °C in staining buffer. Cells were then washed twice with staining buffer followed by fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde (VWR, West Chester, PA, USA). |
Downstream tips |
For flow cytometry immunophenotyping experiments, cells were acquired on an LSR II cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm excitation lasers. The spleen FACS experiments were performed using a FACSAria II instrument (BD Immunocytometry Systems) equipped with 405 nm, 488 nm, or 633 nm lasers located at the University of Chicago Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Chicago, IL, USA. All data collection and sorting were performed using BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and data analyses were performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). |
Upstream tips |
Protocol tips |
Downstream tips |
Spleens and tumors were excised from the 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. Single cell suspensions were produced by homogenizing the spleen samples, and the tumors were minced and subsequently digested with 500 U/mL collagenase type IV (Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation. The resulting single cell suspensions were suspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco, England). |
The cells were then fixed and permeabilized for intracellular staining, and an anti-Foxp3 APC (clone FJK16s, eBioscience) antibody was added. |
All staining reactions were performed in a final volume of 100 μl at 4 °C. Data were acquired using a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo v7.6.2 software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA)." |
Upstream tips |
Spleens and tumors were excised from the 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. Single cell suspensions were produced by homogenizing the spleen samples, and the tumors were minced and subsequently digested with 500 U/mL collagenase type IV (Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation. The resulting single cell suspensions were suspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco, England). |
Protocol tips |
The cells were then fixed and permeabilized for intracellular staining, and an anti-Foxp3 APC (clone FJK16s, eBioscience) antibody was added. |
Downstream tips |
All staining reactions were performed in a final volume of 100 μl at 4 °C. Data were acquired using a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo v7.6.2 software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA)." |
Can't find the product you've used to perform this experiment? It would be great if you can help us by
Adding a product!