RNA isolation / purification Tissue Rat

Get tips on using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, 10 Rxn to perform Site Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) Human - Point mutation HeLa Rab11

Get tips on using In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red to perform TUNEL assay cell type - Rabbit synovial fibroblasts

Get tips on using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, 10 Rxn to perform Site Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) Dog - Point mutation MDCK Rab11-FIP2

Get tips on using Wilms' Tumor 1 (WT1) Protein, Clone 6F-H2 to perform Immunohistochemistry Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1) - Rabbit Mouse -NA-

Get tips on using Corning® Transwell® polycarbonate membrane cell culture inserts to perform Cell migration / Invasion cell type - RAW 264.7

Get tips on using Galacto-Light Plus™ β-Galactosidase Reporter Gene Assay System to perform Reporter gene assay β-galactosidase substrates - RAW 264.7

I would like to regulate the expression of a gene and in order to do that, I have purchased specific siRNA. After optimizing my transfection protocol and using electroporation I have achieved a 60-70% reduction of the gene of interest. However, I cannot observe a significant reduction of mRNA expression but only a reduction of protein. What might be the problem? Could the problem be in my cell treatment method?

Contamination can affect cell characteristics, i.e., growth, metabolism, and morphology leading to unreliable and erroneous experimental data. Depending on the source of contaminants, one can detect contamination by using a light microscope, gram stain, isothermal amplification, or PCR. Bacteria and fungi can usually be identified by optical microscopy. Mycoplasma in cell cultures cannot be detected visually. Hence, these microbes can go unnoticed for long periods and are determined using dedicated assays. Early and rapid identification of contaminants is vital to detect, handle and prevent contamination for good cell-culture practices. However, detection and identification can be challenging and tricky based on usual visual identifications. Hence it is essential to use a standard contamination detection kit to detect and maintain best practices.

Contamination can affect cell characteristics, i.e., growth, metabolism, and morphology leading to unreliable and erroneous experimental data. Depending on the source of contaminants, one can detect contamination by using a light microscope, gram stain, isothermal amplification, or PCR. Bacteria and fungi can usually be identified by optical microscopy. Mycoplasma in cell cultures cannot be detected visually. Hence, these microbes can go unnoticed for long periods and are determined using dedicated assays. Early and rapid identification of contaminants is vital to detect, handle and prevent contamination for good cell-culture practices. However, detection and identification can be challenging and tricky based on usual visual identifications. Hence it is essential to use a standard contamination detection kit to detect and maintain best practices.

Contamination can affect cell characteristics, i.e., growth, metabolism, and morphology leading to unreliable and erroneous experimental data. Depending on the source of contaminants, one can detect contamination by using a light microscope, gram stain, isothermal amplification, or PCR. Bacteria and fungi can usually be identified by optical microscopy. Mycoplasma in cell cultures cannot be detected visually. Hence, these microbes can go unnoticed for long periods and are determined using dedicated assays. Early and rapid identification of contaminants is vital to detect, handle and prevent contamination for good cell-culture practices. However, detection and identification can be challenging and tricky based on usual visual identifications. Hence it is essential to use a standard contamination detection kit to detect and maintain best practices.