dna-methylation-profiling-gene-specific-profiling-a2780-mir-30c-5p

Get tips on using In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red to perform TUNEL assay cell type - A549, NCI-H460, H1299 human lung cancer cells

Get tips on using DIA-310: Anti-CD31 (Ms) from Rat (Clone: SZ31) for mouse FFPE tissue to perform Immunohistochemistry CD31 - Rabbit Rat -NA-

Get tips on using Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V Alexa Fluor™ 488 & Propidium Iodide (PI) to perform Apoptosis assay cell type - RPMI-8226

Get tips on using Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V Alexa Fluor™ 488 & Propidium Iodide (PI) to perform Apoptosis assay cell type - SH-SY5Y

Get tips on using Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V Alexa Fluor™ 488 & Propidium Iodide (PI) to perform Apoptosis assay cell type - HeLa cells

Hello everyone! I am going to do a live/dead assay for my cells and I saw that I can use both fluorescence and absorbance as my detection method. Is there a difference in the results depending on the method? Is one method preferred over the other in certain situations?

Hello! I used Trizol to extract total RNA from in-vitro cultured bacteria (1 X 10^8 cells). After phase separation, I mixed ~0.4 ml of the upper phase which contains RNA with 0.5 mL cold isopropanol. However, the amount of RNA when measured in Nanodrop was very low. In addition, the ratio between 260 and 230 was around 0.1 to 0.5. Is there a chance that my sample was contaminated by the Trizol reagent? When I collected the aqueous phase I made sure to not touch the lower phase. What should I do?

Get tips on using Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (LDH) to perform Live / Dead assay bacteria - Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Get tips on using Cell Counting Kit-8 to perform Live / Dead assay mammalian cells - GH3

Get tips on using EZ4U - Cell Proliferation Assay to perform Live / Dead assay mammalian cells - GH3