Get tips on using in situ Cell Death Detection Kit, POD to perform TUNEL assay cell type - PANC-1 human pancriatic cancer
Get tips on using In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein to perform TUNEL assay cell type - PC-3 human prostate cancer
Get tips on using In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein to perform TUNEL assay cell type - 3T3 L1 mouse adipose tissue
Get tips on using In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein to perform TUNEL assay cell type - SK-MEL-2 human melanoma
Get tips on using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit to perform DNA quantification Human - MDA-MB-231
Get tips on using Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit to perform RNA quantification Fuorimetric - mouse kidney tissue
Get tips on using Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit to perform RNA quantification Fuorimetric - mouse liver tissue
Get tips on using Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit to perform RNA quantification Fuorimetric - mouse adipose tissue
Hello everyone! I am going to do a live/dead assay for my cells and I saw that I can use both fluorescence and absorbance as my detection method. Is there a difference in the results depending on the method? Is one method preferred over the other in certain situations?
Get tips on using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit to perform DNA quantification Colorectal aenocarenoma (SW48) - paraffin embeded
Fill out your contact details and receive price quotes in your Inbox
Outsource experiment